Diferencia entre revisiones de «Pendiente resbaladiza»
De CreacionWiki
(Página creada con '{{traducción}} right '''Slippery slope''' also known as '''absurd extrapolation''', '''thin edge of the wedge''', '''domino fallacy''' or '''camel's ...') |
|||
| Línea 1: | Línea 1: | ||
{{traducción}} | {{traducción}} | ||
| − | [[ | + | [[File:Falacia Lógica.png|200px|right]] |
'''Slippery slope''' also known as '''absurd extrapolation''', '''thin edge of the wedge''', '''domino fallacy''' or '''camel's nose'''<ref name=three>{{cite book|author=Bennett, Bo|title=Logically...Fallacious:The Ultimate Collection of Over 300 Logical Fallacies|publisher=eBookIt.com|location=Sudbury, MA|year=2012|page=199|isbn=978-1-4566-0752-4}}</ref> is an informal fallacy which occurs when the conclusion of an argument relies on a supposed chain reaction, starting from a relatively insignificant first event, leading to a more significant event, and so forth, until an ultimate event take place, and there is no sufficient reason to think that the chain reaction will actually take place.<ref name=hurley>{{cite book|author=Hurley, Patrick J|title=A Concise Introduction to Logic|publisher=Thompson Wadsworth|location=Belmont, CA|edition=10th|year=2008|page=139|isbn=978-0-495-50383-5}}</ref><ref name=three /> | '''Slippery slope''' also known as '''absurd extrapolation''', '''thin edge of the wedge''', '''domino fallacy''' or '''camel's nose'''<ref name=three>{{cite book|author=Bennett, Bo|title=Logically...Fallacious:The Ultimate Collection of Over 300 Logical Fallacies|publisher=eBookIt.com|location=Sudbury, MA|year=2012|page=199|isbn=978-1-4566-0752-4}}</ref> is an informal fallacy which occurs when the conclusion of an argument relies on a supposed chain reaction, starting from a relatively insignificant first event, leading to a more significant event, and so forth, until an ultimate event take place, and there is no sufficient reason to think that the chain reaction will actually take place.<ref name=hurley>{{cite book|author=Hurley, Patrick J|title=A Concise Introduction to Logic|publisher=Thompson Wadsworth|location=Belmont, CA|edition=10th|year=2008|page=139|isbn=978-0-495-50383-5}}</ref><ref name=three /> | ||
| − | == | + | ==Ejemplos== |
* "we can not let our son leave the closet because if we do, he might want to leave our house. If he leaves home he might eventually want to leave the neighborhood. If he leaves the neighborhood, he can be hijacked and used as a slave in another country. Therefore we should keep our son locked in the closet." | * "we can not let our son leave the closet because if we do, he might want to leave our house. If he leaves home he might eventually want to leave the neighborhood. If he leaves the neighborhood, he can be hijacked and used as a slave in another country. Therefore we should keep our son locked in the closet." | ||
| − | == | + | ==Ejemplo formal== |
| − | + | Formalmente, esta falacia tiene la estructura siguiente: | |
''A'' leads to ''B'', then ''C'', ... then ultimately ''Z''! | ''A'' leads to ''B'', then ''C'', ... then ultimately ''Z''! | ||
| Línea 13: | Línea 13: | ||
{{clearboth}} | {{clearboth}} | ||
| − | == | + | == Véase también == |
| − | {{ | + | <table style="border:1px solid #AAAAAA; background: #EDF1F1; float:right; width:100px; margin-left:15px;"> |
| − | + | <tr><td>{{Falacia |Pendiente resbaladiza}} | |
| + | <tr><td>Use la plantilla <nowiki>{{Falacia |Pendiente resbaladiza}}</nowiki> para insertar la advertencia anterior en una página que contiene un argumento "pendiente resbaladiza". La plantilla conecta la etiqueta de advertencia a esta página. | ||
| + | </table> | ||
| − | + | * [[Falacia lógica]] | |
| − | + | ||
| − | [[ | + | {{Referencias}} |
| + | |||
| + | [[Categoría:Filosofía]] | ||
| + | [[Categoría:Falacia lógica]] | ||
[[en:Slippery slope]] | [[en:Slippery slope]] | ||
[[pt:Escorregadela]] | [[pt:Escorregadela]] | ||
Revisión del 00:55 31 oct 2013
Slippery slope also known as absurd extrapolation, thin edge of the wedge, domino fallacy or camel's nose[1] is an informal fallacy which occurs when the conclusion of an argument relies on a supposed chain reaction, starting from a relatively insignificant first event, leading to a more significant event, and so forth, until an ultimate event take place, and there is no sufficient reason to think that the chain reaction will actually take place.[2][1]
Ejemplos
- "we can not let our son leave the closet because if we do, he might want to leave our house. If he leaves home he might eventually want to leave the neighborhood. If he leaves the neighborhood, he can be hijacked and used as a slave in another country. Therefore we should keep our son locked in the closet."
Ejemplo formal
Formalmente, esta falacia tiene la estructura siguiente:
A leads to B, then C, ... then ultimately Z!
Véase también
Este argumento representa una Pendiente resbaladiza. |
| Use la plantilla {{Falacia |Pendiente resbaladiza}} para insertar la advertencia anterior en una página que contiene un argumento "pendiente resbaladiza". La plantilla conecta la etiqueta de advertencia a esta página. |
