Diferencia entre revisiones de «Nuevo Testamento»
(→Apologética) |
|||
| Línea 8: | Línea 8: | ||
==Apologética== | ==Apologética== | ||
| − | Hay dos métodos aceptados propuestos por los estudios bíblicos y en particular estudios bíblicos del Nuevo Testamento que cuando son seguidos, sirven como una especie de lecho de roca histórica de partida para defender la resurrección de Jesucristo, y la singularidad del Nuevo Testamento entre la literatura antigua. | + | Hay dos métodos aceptados propuestos por los estudios bíblicos y en particular estudios bíblicos del Nuevo Testamento que cuando son seguidos, sirven como una especie de lecho de roca histórica de partida para defender la resurrección de Jesucristo, y la singularidad del Nuevo Testamento entre la literatura antigua. Hay en primer lugar el método de los hechos mínimos con su pionero Gary Habermas, reconocido como una autoridad mundial en la resurrección de Jesús. Secondly there is what is called the general reliability method which is utilized to articulate a case for textual stability of the New Testament rather than the historicity of particular events within the life of Jesus.<ref>[http://www.garyhabermas.com/articles/crj_recentperspectives/crj_recentperspectives.htm Recent Perspectives on the Reliability of the Gospels] by Gary R. Habermas. Originally published in the Christian Research Journal / vol. 28, no. 1, 2005.</ref> |
===Método de mínimos hechos=== | ===Método de mínimos hechos=== | ||
| Línea 18: | Línea 18: | ||
{{Artículo principal|Método de fiabilidad general}} | {{Artículo principal|Método de fiabilidad general}} | ||
| − | The general reliability method is [[apologetics]] from [[textual criticism]] that focuses on the textual features of the New Testament. As ancient literature the NT is compared with other literature from which there are surviving manuscripts. Specific categories of chronological criteria relative to biblical and non-biblical manuscripts are compared. The method formulated during the late 19th and early 20th centuries as [[archeological]] discoveries brought to light the manuscript and therefore textual data necessary to reason methodically. The general reliability method is underpinned by the whole range of practices within the field of [[textual criticism]]. So much so is the scholarly field so important for the general reliability method that the methodology is sometimes referred to as simply textual criticism of the New Testament. What that naturally amounts to is a unique status for the texts of the NT. The general reliability method is still used today by Christians but sophisticated treatments by apologists regard it in light of what was pioneered in the 1970's by [[Gary Habermas]] called the [[minimal facts method]]. | + | The general reliability method is [[apologetics]] from [[textual criticism]] that focuses on the textual features of the New Testament. As ancient literature the NT is compared with other literature from which there are surviving manuscripts. Specific categories of chronological criteria relative to biblical and non-biblical manuscripts are compared. The method formulated during the late 19th and early 20th centuries as [[archeological]] discoveries brought to light the manuscript and therefore textual data necessary to reason methodically. The general reliability method is underpinned by the whole range of practices within the field of [[textual criticism]]. So much so is the scholarly field so important for the general reliability method that the methodology is sometimes referred to as simply textual criticism of the New Testament. What that naturally amounts to is a unique status for the texts of the NT. The general reliability method is still used today by Christians but sophisticated treatments by apologists regard it in light of what was pioneered in the 1970's by [[Gary Habermas]] called the [[minimal facts method]]. |
==Libros del Nuevo Testamento== | ==Libros del Nuevo Testamento== | ||
Revisión del 01:23 31 oct 2013
El Nuevo Testamento es una colección de veintisiete libros y cartas, escritas por testigos y por las personas que obtuvieron el testimonio de testigos presenciales.[1] Siendo que los más antiguos manuscritos existentes están en griego y en el contexto de la helenización que ayudó a desarrollar la cultura del siglo I en la Palestina, los estudiosos han determinado que el Nuevo Testamento fue escrito originalmente en griego. Completado antes de 100 dC, el énfasis del Nuevo Testamento es la vida, las enseñanzas, la crucifixión, la muerte, la resurrección y el don de la salvación de Jesús de Nazaret. También se enfoca en la historia temprana de la iglesia cristiana específicamente en el libro de los Hechos.
Contenido
Lectura e Interpretación
NT Wright, un influyente erudito del Nuevo Testamento, pinta un panorama rápido de la historia de la lectura del Nuevo Testamento en su libro The New Testament and the People of God. Wright recomienda leer el Nuevo Testamento en el contexto no sólo histórico, sino teológico, lo que permite el cristianismo mantener una práctica de la teología histórica. Sin embargo a lo largo de la historia de la lectura del Nuevo Testamento ha habido;
| “ | ... cuatro medios (lecturas pre-crítica, histórica, teológica y postmodernas) corresponden de manera muy amplia a tres movimientos dentro de la historia de la cultura occidental en los últimos siglos. La primera pertenece al período anterior al Iluminismo del siglo XVIII; la segunda, el énfasis principal del Iluminismo, a veces conocido como "modernismo" o "modernidad"; el tercero, a un correctiva de la segunda, aún dentro de la cosmovisión del Iluminismo ha comenzado a romperse bajo interrogatorio desde muchos lados, y que ha llegado a conocerse como "posmoderna".[2] | ” |
Apologética
Hay dos métodos aceptados propuestos por los estudios bíblicos y en particular estudios bíblicos del Nuevo Testamento que cuando son seguidos, sirven como una especie de lecho de roca histórica de partida para defender la resurrección de Jesucristo, y la singularidad del Nuevo Testamento entre la literatura antigua. Hay en primer lugar el método de los hechos mínimos con su pionero Gary Habermas, reconocido como una autoridad mundial en la resurrección de Jesús. Secondly there is what is called the general reliability method which is utilized to articulate a case for textual stability of the New Testament rather than the historicity of particular events within the life of Jesus.[3]
Método de mínimos hechos
Véase artículo principal: The minimal facts method is a historical apologetic that makes the case for the supernatural resurrection of Jesus Christ. The minimal facts method is also called the minimal facts approach and was pioneered in the 1970's by the philosopher, historian and prominent Christian apologist Gary R. Habermas. It is considered within specifically historical apologetics as a scholarly approach to establish specific reliability in the Bible showing the central doctrine of Christianity as historical fact.[4]
Método de fiabilidad general
The general reliability method is apologetics from textual criticism that focuses on the textual features of the New Testament. As ancient literature the NT is compared with other literature from which there are surviving manuscripts. Specific categories of chronological criteria relative to biblical and non-biblical manuscripts are compared. The method formulated during the late 19th and early 20th centuries as archeological discoveries brought to light the manuscript and therefore textual data necessary to reason methodically. The general reliability method is underpinned by the whole range of practices within the field of textual criticism. So much so is the scholarly field so important for the general reliability method that the methodology is sometimes referred to as simply textual criticism of the New Testament. What that naturally amounts to is a unique status for the texts of the NT. The general reliability method is still used today by Christians but sophisticated treatments by apologists regard it in light of what was pioneered in the 1970's by Gary Habermas called the minimal facts method.
Libros del Nuevo Testamento
There are several divisions of the New Testament which are the Gospels, Pauline epistles or letters, the general epistles and the final book of the Bible called Revelation.
Evangelios
The word gospel [ˈɡɒspəl] derives from the Old English word gōdspell from gōd, meaning "good" and spell, meaning "message" or "news" - compare the Old Norse guthspjall, the Old High German guotspell or the Germanic gutspeil. Therefore the word gospel is the English translation of the Koine Greek εὐαγγέλιον (euangelion, εὖ eu "good" + ἄγγελος angelos "messenger"), Latinized evangelium.[5][6] The Acts of the Apostles are a continuance of the gospel Luke, documenting the history of the early Christian church, beginning immediately following Jesus' death and resurrection. Of the authors, only Matthew and John had met Jesus; they were among His disciples during His earthly ministry. Mark was a companion of Peter, and scholarship generally sees his gospel as the first to be written down approximately 65 AD. Luke is considered the author of both his gospel and the book of Acts and is generally referred to as Luke-Acts.
The kinds of material covered within the gospels in regard to the life and death of Jesus Christ are basically five types. They are; parables, miracle stories, pronouncement stories which are anecdotes that preserve the memory of something Jesus said, and were also very popular within the greater Greco-Roman world as well. Individual sayings are also part of the gospels but do not have narrative context like pronouncement stories. And then there are passion and resurrection narratives, which are covered in far more detail than any other types of material found in the gospels.[7]
The gospels are;
There is also Acts of the Apostles which is usually taken in conjunction with Luke and referred to as Luke-Acts.
Epístolas Paulinas
Estas son las cartas escritas a diversas comunidades cristianas por el apóstol Pablo.
- Epístola a los Romanos
- Primera Epístola a los Corintios
- Segunda Epístola a los Corintios
- Epístola a los Gálatas
- Epístola a los Filipenses
- Primera Epístola a los Tesalonicenses
- Segunda Epístola a los Tesalonicenses
- Epístola a los Efesios
- Epístola a los Colosenses
- Primera Epístola a Timoteo
- Segunda Epístola a Timoteo
- Epístola a Tito
- Epístola a Filemón
- Epístola a los Hebreos
Epístolas Generales
- Epístola de Santiago
- Primera Epístola de Pedro
- Segunda Epístola de Pedro
- Primera Epístola de Juan
- Segunda Epístola de Juan
- Tercera Epístola de Juan
- Epístola de Judas
Revelation
- Main Article: Revelation
The Book of Revelation, also called The Apocalypse, is the last work in the New Testament as well as the whole Bible, written close to AD 100 by the Apostle John during his exile on the Greek island of Patmos. Revelation is concerned with the condition of the Seven Churches of Asia before going deeply into a description of the last days prior to the beginning of the Millennial Age.
Referencias
- ↑ Lecture with Dr. Peter Williams on the evidence that builds a case for eyewitness accounts in the New Testament By Lanier Theological Library. Mar 23, 2011
- ↑ NT Wright, The New Testament and the People of God (Fortress Press 1992), pg. 7
- ↑ Recent Perspectives on the Reliability of the Gospels by Gary R. Habermas. Originally published in the Christian Research Journal / vol. 28, no. 1, 2005.
- ↑ A historical fact is what historians consider knowable history; they do not necessarily mean it to be a logical proof.
- ↑ The word "gospel" on Dictionary.com: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/gospel
- ↑ Good News By Wikipedia
- ↑ Mark Allan Powell, Introducing the New Testament: A Historical, Literary, and Theological Survey (Baker Academic 2009), pgg. 85-92
Enlaces externos
- Online Resources for Introducing the New Testament: A Historical, Literary, and Theological Survey By Baker Academic
- New Testament professor Craig A. Evans discusses the Biblical manuscripts, textual criticism, and the Dead Sea Scrolls
- Richard Bauckham Lectures – What Sort of History are the Gospels? Richard Bauckham on the Gospels as (Reliable) Historical Biography
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
