Falacia de composición

De CreacionWiki
Revisión del 12:51 29 oct 2013 de Luiz Alexandre Silva (Discusión | contribuciones) (Página creada con '{{traducción}} right The '''fallacy of composition''' arises when the inference of an argument depends on the erroneous transference of an attribute ...')

(dif) ← Revisión anterior | Revisión actual (dif) | Revisión siguiente → (dif)
Saltar a: navegación, buscar
Icono de traducción.png
Este artículo o sección está siendo traducido. Puedes colaborar con la CreaciónWiki en la traducción desde el artículo original.
X mark.png

The fallacy of composition arises when the inference of an argument depends on the erroneous transference of an attribute of the parts of something to the whole.[1] This is the opposite of the fallacy of division.[2]

Examples

  • "Richard likes sardines. He also likes toffee pudding. Therefore, it is quite sure that he would like a toffee pudding topped with sardines."
  • The frequent accusation that design theorists reduce life to mechanism, commits a fallacy of composition, arguing incorrectly that what is true of the parts must be true of the whole since just the fact the cells have machine-like aspects does not imply that they are machines.[3]

Formal example

Formally speaking this fallacy has the following structure:

  • p is part of w
  • p has property t
  • therefore, w has property t

See Also

Plantilla:Fallacy page

References

Plantilla:Reflist
  1. Plantilla:Cite book
  2. Plantilla:Cite book
  3. Plantilla:Cite book